CAM-SIMA diagnostics for all gravity wave parameterizations#338
CAM-SIMA diagnostics for all gravity wave parameterizations#338jimmielin wants to merge 6 commits intoESCOMP:developmentfrom
Conversation
nusbaume
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for bringing in these diagnostics @jimmielin! I did have some some questions/concerns, mostly related to standard names and/or units, but of course if any of them are too much of a burden at this stage then we can likely just make an issue for it and deal with them later. Thanks again!
schemes/sima_diagnostics/gravity_wave_drag_common_diagnostics.F90
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
schemes/sima_diagnostics/gravity_wave_drag_convection_deep_diagnostics.F90
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
schemes/sima_diagnostics/gravity_wave_drag_convection_deep_diagnostics.F90
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
schemes/sima_diagnostics/gravity_wave_drag_convection_deep_diagnostics.meta
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
schemes/sima_diagnostics/gravity_wave_drag_convection_deep_diagnostics.meta
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
schemes/sima_diagnostics/gravity_wave_drag_frontogenesis_diagnostics.F90
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
schemes/sima_diagnostics/gravity_wave_drag_frontogenesis_diagnostics.meta
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
schemes/sima_diagnostics/gravity_wave_drag_moving_mountain_diagnostics.F90
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
schemes/sima_diagnostics/gravity_wave_drag_moving_mountain_diagnostics.F90
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
schemes/sima_diagnostics/gravity_wave_drag_moving_mountain_diagnostics.meta
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Jesse Nusbaumer <nusbaume@ucar.edu>
|
Thanks @nusbaume for the review! I edited some standard names throughout the GW parameterizations in particular to address concerns about the use of |
nusbaume
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for thoroughly checking and modifying all of the units and standard names @jimmielin! I just had one last comment update request, but otherwise this all looks good to me!
| real(kind_phys), intent(out) :: dttdf(:, :) ! Temperature tendency from diffusion [K s-1] | ||
| real(kind_phys), intent(out) :: dttke(:, :) ! Temperature tendency from kinetic energy dissipation [K s-1] | ||
| real(kind_phys), intent(out) :: dttdf(:, :) ! Dry air enthalpy tendency from diffusion [J kg-1 s-1] | ||
| real(kind_phys), intent(out) :: dttke(:, :) ! Dry air tendency from kinetic energy dissipation [J kg-1 s-1] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think enthalpy is missing from the comment here for dttke?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks, updated! There were a few others I missed looking back so d357db5 addresses all these.
Originator(s): @jimmielin
Description (include issue title and the keyword ['closes', 'fixes', 'resolves'] and issue number):
List all namelist files that were added or changed: N/A
List all files eliminated and why: N/A
List all files added and what they do:
List all existing files that have been modified, and describe the changes:
(Helpful git command:
git diff --name-status development...<your_branch_name>)List all automated tests that failed, as well as an explanation for why they weren't fixed:
New baselines will be created in the eventual CAM-SIMA PR
Is this an answer-changing PR? If so, is it a new physics package, algorithm change, tuning change, etc?
New diagnostic fields
Model "state" is b4b
If yes to the above question, describe how this code was validated with the new/modified features: